ap.38.fail/legislation/sars.act.2022.htm
Anya ddb5f95f86 silly changes
ive decided this no longer warrants legible commits
2022-06-13 16:36:44 -07:00

81 lines
3.1 KiB
HTML
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>AP Legislation</title>
<link rel="icon" type="image/x-icon" href="../media/img/flags/ap.png">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="style.css">
</head>
<body>
<table width="900" cellpadding="3" border="0" bgcolor=#d5e4c3 text=#090909>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<center>
<a href="../index.htm"><img src="../media/img/flags/ap.png"></a>
<h4 style="margin: 0">AP Legislation</h4>
</center>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign=top bgcolor=#fefefe>
<div class="legislation">
<h1 id="sars-act">SARS Act</h1>
<p>This document proposes the adherence of the Start Agnostic Routing
Standard (SARS) as an infrastructural requirement to members of the
Arsenio Pact.</p>
<p>For information about the SARS standard not described in this
document, ask on the <a href="https://discord.gg/2QyxwN3KAK">SARS
Discord</a>, or ask your nations infrastructure representative.</p>
<p>This document was written by members of the Anyakovan Institute of
Technology (AKIT) to promote the usage of the Start Agnostic Routing
Standard.</p>
<h2 id="motivation">Motivation</h2>
<p>Previous experience has indicated the trend of a complex,
interconnected rail network being preferred across all modern CivCraft
servers. Despite this, very little progress has been made to standardize
rail infrastructure by the community.</p>
<p>The most implemented rail standard, the <strong>KANI</strong>, was
primarily maintained by a sole individual, Amel. Despite this, it was
widely popular &amp; frequently used by civilians, greatly speeding up
trade and leisure.</p>
<p>The popularity of automatic transportation begs the question:
<em>why</em> do states not allocate the proper resources to the
construction &amp; expansion of our networks?</p>
<h2 id="implementation">Implementation</h2>
<p>The Start Agnostic Routing Standard is ideal for any government to
officially adopt; its lack of reliance on a central website &amp;
simplistic “level” classification lets any sovereign nation establish an
infinite amount of networks in the 4+ range.</p>
<p>The Arsenio Pact adopts the following design:</p>
<ul>
<li>Advocate for &amp; establish an external level 2 domain.</li>
<li>Require each member state to create its own level 3 junction.
<ul>
<li>Additionally, member states may create as many additional internal
levels as required.</li>
</ul></li>
</ul>
<h2 id="adherence">Adherence</h2>
<p>While not intrinsically tied to the standard, these additional rules
must be followed by all member states to simplify the rail connection
process:</p>
<ul>
<li>Members must place rails at Y value 9, or surface level.</li>
<li>Require each member state to accurately document &amp; maintain its
destinations.
<ul>
<li>This report should depict the state of each rail, a description of
the destination, whether the rail is above or below ground level, &amp;
disclose whether or not a destination is private property.</li>
</ul></li>
<li>Allocate resources from tributes towards the development of rail
networks.</li>
</ul>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>