Philosophy Of Ai

PHIL-4260

This course may be roughly divided into two general areas: philosophical problems in AI and philosophical issues that arise because of AI. An example from the first area is the Knower Paradox, a paradox in which an apparently desirable formalism for handling an agent’s knowledge leads to inconsistency; an example from the second area is John Searle’s attack on so-called “Strong” AI by way of his Chinese Room argument, wherein he claims that because a computer at bottom just manipulates symbols it cannot genuinely understand.

4 credits
Prereqs:
none

Past Term Data

Offered
Not Offered
Offered as Cross-Listing Only
No Term Data
Spring Summer Fall
(Session 1) (Session 2)
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
Philosophy Of Ai (4c)
  • Bram Van Heuveln
Seats Taken: 21/25
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
Philosophy Of Ai (4c)
  • Selmer Bringsjord
Seats Taken: 29/30
2000
Philosophy Of Ai (4c)
  • Selmer Bringsjord
Seats Taken: 28/30
1999
1998
Philosophy Of Ai (4c)
  • Selmer Bringsjord
Seats Taken: 24/30