# Philosophy Of Ai

## PHIL-4260

This course may be roughly divided into two general areas: philosophical problems in AI and philosophical issues that arise because of AI. An example from the first area is the Knower Paradox, a paradox in which an apparently desirable formalism for handling an agent’s knowledge leads to inconsistency; an example from the second area is John Searle’s attack on so-called “Strong” AI by way of his Chinese Room argument, wherein he claims that because a computer at bottom just manipulates symbols it cannot genuinely understand.

4 credits
Prereqs:
none

# Past Term Data
Offered
Not Offered
Offered as Cross-Listing Only
No Term Data
Simple View
Detailed View

| Spring | Summer | Fall
--- | --- | --- | ---
| (Session 1) | (Session 2) |
2024 |  |  |
2023 |  |  |
2022 |  |  |
2021 |  |  |
2020 |  |  |
2019 |  |  |
2018 |  |  |
2017 |  |  |
2016 |  |  |
2015 |  |  |
2014 |  |  |
2013 |  |  |
2012 |  |  |
2011 |  |  |
2010 |  |  |
2009 |  |  |
2008 |  |  |
2007 |  |  | Philosophy Of Ai (4c) Bram Van Heuveln Seats Taken: 21/25
2006 |  |  |
2005 |  |  |
2004 |  |  |
2003 |  |  |
2002 |  |  |
2001 |  |  | Philosophy Of Ai (4c) Selmer Bringsjord Seats Taken: 29/30
2000 |  |  | Philosophy Of Ai (4c) Selmer Bringsjord Seats Taken: 28/30
1999 |  |  |
1998 |  |  | Philosophy Of Ai (4c) Selmer Bringsjord Seats Taken: 24/30